Anderson v. City and County of San Francisco

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the court should not attempt to parse out a litigant’s request for attorneys’ fees on a claim-by-claim basis when the claims are interrelated
• noting that “FEHA is interpreted consistently with Title VII’
• “We also recognized that it would be impossible to prove a BFOQ defense without ‘demonstrat[ing] that . . . alternative approaches . . . are not viable.’” (citation omitted)
• “FEHA is 9 interpreted consistently with Title VII.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).