Skip to main content
· 5/19/1890

Anderson v. Carkins

Citations

  • 135 U.S. 483
  • 10 S. Ct. 905
  • 34 L. Ed. 272
  • 1890 U.S. LEXIS 2035

Syllabus

<p>In decreeing specific performance of a contract for tbe conveyance of a ■ tract of land in a suit’where the defence was. that the contract was against public policy' and void under the homestead laws of the United States, a state court necessarily passes upon a federal question, although it may put its decision upon other grounds.</p> <p>A’ contract by a homesteader to convey a portion of the tract when he shall acquire title from the United States is against public policy and void;' and, it cannot be enforced, although a valuable consideration may have passed to the homesteader from the other party.</p>

Judges: Brewer

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.