Anderson v. Cade

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an expert report was unreliable where it was “simply devoid of any explanation regarding how [the expert’s] professional experience led him to [his] conclu[sions]”
• providing that “as a general matter, courts should not permit untimely disclosure of new opinions to fill gaps in expert proof”
• at summary judgment, the court can decide on questions of admissibility of evidence including expert opinion

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).