Anderson v. Bryan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• upholding the district court’s decision to deny plaintiff leave to amend its complaint, noting that the district court “found that [plaintiff] could pursue its claims against the non-diverse defendants in state courts”
• affirming the summary-judgment dismissal of a Texas fraud claim on the basis that a promise of future performance was not actionable fraud because the promisor’s multiple attempts to perform belied any showing that it had no intention of performing
• “In Hensgens v. Deere & Co., this court directed district courts to exercise discretion when deciding whether to join a non-diverse party. . . .”
• “In Hensgens v. Deere & Co., this court directed district courts to exercise discretion when deciding whether to join a non-diverse party. . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).