Skip to main content
· 8/10/1989

Anderson v. Booth (In Re Booth)

Citations

  • 103 B.R. 800
  • 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1293
  • 1989 WL 89837

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Because Rules 4007(c) and 9006(b) provide a jurisdictional basis for complaints objecting to dischargeability under Section 523(c), there can be no waiver for objecting to the timeliness of the complaint.”
  • court must dismiss complaint, although with great regret, as there is no discretion to allow a late filed complaint in the absence of a motion for time filed prior to the expiration of that period

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Edward R. Gaines

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.