· 8/10/1989
Anderson v. Booth (In Re Booth)
Citations
- 103 B.R. 800
- 1989 Bankr. LEXIS 1293
- 1989 WL 89837
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Because Rules 4007(c) and 9006(b) provide a jurisdictional basis for complaints objecting to dischargeability under Section 523(c), there can be no waiver for objecting to the timeliness of the complaint.”
- court must dismiss complaint, although with great regret, as there is no discretion to allow a late filed complaint in the absence of a motion for time filed prior to the expiration of that period
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Edward R. Gaines
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.