Anderson v. BNSF Railway Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding although the ICCTA did not expressly mention railroad crossings, the jurisdiction of the ICCTA was exclusive over anything having an economic impact on the railroad and thus was preempted by the act (citing Franks Inv. Co. v. Union Pac. R.R. Co., 534 F.3d 443 (5th Cir.2008))
• Termination Act preempts state proceeding to order rail carrier to reopen private crossing
• Termination Act preempts state proceeding to order rail carrier to reopen private crossing
• Termination Act preempts state proceeding to order rail carrier to reopen private crossing
• Termination Act preempts state proceeding to order rail carrier to reopen private crossing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).