Skip to main content

Anderson v. Bell

Citations

  • 433 So. 2d 1202

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the immediate recognition of riparian rights in land that has been overflowed would create a general disincentive to improve property with artificial bodies of water
  • noting that the immediate recognition of riparian rights in land that has been overflowed would create a general disincentive to improve property with artificial bodies of water
  • distinguishing that case from the court's earlier decision in Duval v. Thomas , 114 So.2d 791 (Fla. 1959), discussed infra , in which the Florida Supreme Court had adopted the civil law rule

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adkins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

10 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.