Skip to main content
· 10/10/1996

Anderson v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT FOR ZONING

Citations

  • 931 P.2d 517
  • 1996 Colo. App. LEXIS 283
  • 1996 WL 580419

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • exhaustion would have been futile as the parties had notice of the zoning administrator’s interpretation of the pertinent law
  • where plaintiffs had notice of administrator’s interpretation of the pertinent law, requiring them to await another and different answer on the same question would have been an exercise in futility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sternberg, Roy, Tursi

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.