· 10/10/1996
Anderson v. BD. OF ADJUSTMENT FOR ZONING
Citations
- 931 P.2d 517
- 1996 Colo. App. LEXIS 283
- 1996 WL 580419
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- exhaustion would have been futile as the parties had notice of the zoning administrator’s interpretation of the pertinent law
- where plaintiffs had notice of administrator’s interpretation of the pertinent law, requiring them to await another and different answer on the same question would have been an exercise in futility
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sternberg, Roy, Tursi
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.