Anderson v. Arnette

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Iran’s refusal of diplomatic note served pursuant to section 1608(a)(4) was sufficient for personal jurisdiction
• concluding that “Plaintiffs’ injuries were ‘reasonably foreseeable or anticipated as a natural consequence’ of Iran’s support to AAH”
• concluding that “Plaintiffs’ injuries were ‘reasonably foreseeable or anticipated as a natural consequence’ of Iran’s support to AAH”
• holding that the torture and death of U.S. soldiers was a reasonably foreseeable consequence of Iran’s provision of material support or resources to Iraqi militia group
• finding that Iran had continued this practice by providing the militia at issue there with weapons, training, intelligence, and money for torture and hostage-taking
• finding that Iran had continued this practice by providing the militia at issue there with weapons, training, intelligence, and money for torture and hostage-taking

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).