Anderson v. Armour & Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• rejecting as “completely untenable” the lessor’s argument that “the clause in question was not breached because” the leased premises were within “a larger tract ... [that] was disposed of’
• court focuses on language of written right of refusal first

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).