Anderson v. Anderson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[t]he consideration does not have to be an equivalent value in order to be valuable but it must be substantial and not merely nominal\ (citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Swanson v. Swanson
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-04-12· cited 16×
• Jarvis v. Technical Land, Inc. (In Re Technical Land, Inc.)
  District of Columbia· 1994-06-01· cited 4×
• Christensen v. N.D. Dep't of Human Services
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 2011-04-12

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Dixon v. Kaufman
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1953-05-07· cited 33×
• United States v. Certain Parcels of Land Situate
  S.D. California· 1949-08-01· cited 19×
• Williston Cooperative Credit Union v. Fossum
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1988-08-15· cited 19×
• Loken v. Magrum
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1986-01-07· cited 18×
• Red River Valley Land & Investment Co. v. Smith
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1898-01-27· cited 15×
• Horton v. Kyburz
  California Supreme Court· 1959-11-17· cited 13×
• Nelson v. Christianson
  North Dakota Supreme Court· 1984-01-17· cited 10×