Skip to main content
· 11/15/1990

Anderson v. American Society of Plastic & Reconstructive Surgeons

Citations

  • 807 P.2d 825
  • 148 Utah Adv. Rep. 3
  • 1990 Utah LEXIS 94
  • 1990 WL 267430

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the federal approach to addressing 12(b)(2) motions is motivated by a concern for these three factors
  • stating that, in situations where an evidentiary hearing is not held, \the plaintiff must prove jurisdiction at trial by a preponderance of the evidence after making a prima facie showing before trial\
  • approving procedures employed by federal trial courts when making pretrial determinations regarding personal jurisdiction as appropriate guidelines for Utah's trial courts
  • approving procedures employed by federal trial courts when making pretrial determinations regarding personal jurisdiction as appropriate guidelines for Utah's trial courts
  • “[I]n a pretrial determination of jurisdiction, a plaintiff cannot rely on allegations made in the complaint if the defendant has specifically controverted alleged jurisdictional facts by affidavit.”
  • “The plaintiffs factual allegations are accepted as true unless specifically controverted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Durham, Hall, Howe, Stewart, Zimmerman

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.