Anderson v. AKZO NOBEL COATINGS, INC.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• observing that “polygraph tests have been widely excluded . . . as unreliable”
• applying de novo standard to review grant of motion in limine to strike experts and grant of summary judgment
• rejecting the argument that a plaintiff had to prove acceptance of the “specific causal connection” between the “specific toxic organic solvents” and the “specific polymicrogyria birth defect”
• “The Frye test is implicated only where the opinion offered is based upon novel science.”
• \Expert medical testimony must meet the standard of reasonable medical certainty or reasonable medical probability.\
• “Expert medical testimony must meet the standard of reasonable medical certainty or reasonable medical probability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).