Anderson, Sr. v. D.C. Dep't of Employment Services

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Simmons does not require the trial court to \educate\ potential jurors on effect of parole ineligibility during voir dire
• holding that Simmons does not require the trial court to “educate” potential jurors on effect of parole ineligibility during voir dire
• holding that “[t]he admission of the untested confession of [a codefendant] violated petitioner’s Confrontation Clause rights”
• holding that the admission of an accomplice's out-of-court confession violated the petitioner's Confrontation Clause rights
• holding that admission at trial of non-testifying accomplice’s statement against penal interest violates defendant’s rights under the Confrontation Clause and noting that such statements are inherently unreliable
• holding that the admission of an accomplice's out-of-court confession violated the petitioner's Confrontation Clause rights

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).