Anderson & Nafziger v. G. T. Newcomb, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• the section “was intended * * * to abolish the presumption that a writing is a total integration”
• courts “should consider not only the language of the agreement but all extrinsic evidence relevant to the issue of whether the parties intended the written agreement to be a complete integration”
• courts \should consider not only the language of the agreement but all extrinsic evidence relevant to the issue of whether the parties intended the written agreement to be a complete integration\
• reasonableness of time of delivery of goods when no time of delivery was stated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).