Anderson Group, LLC v. City of Saratoga Springs

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant \waived its argument regarding the inconsistency of the jury verdict\ and therefore \the district court should not have reached the merits of that argument\
• stating that contentions that an expert's assumptions are unfounded go to weight, not admissibility
• \[S]tanding is a threshold matter [that a court] must resolve before reaching the merits.\ (internal quotation marks omitted)
• “[S]tanding is a threshold matter [that a court] must resolve before reaching the merits.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• finding waiver of right to contest inconsistencies in a jury verdict where the moving party failed to object before the court excused the jury
• ordering “a new trial limited to the issue of damages unless [the plaintiff] agrees to a remittitur reducing the $1,000,000 compensatory damages award to $100,000”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).