· 9/21/1932
Anderson, Exr. v. Houpt
Citations
- 184 N.E. 29
- 43 Ohio App. 538
- 13 Ohio Law. Abs. 16
- 1932 Ohio App. LEXIS 322
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- presumption that the department of insurance did its duty and had ascertained that the policy in question complied with the requirements of law
- presumption that the department of insurance did its duty and had ascertained that the policy in question complied with the requirements of law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Lemert, Sherick, Montgomery
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.