Skip to main content
· 8/14/2015

Anderson Ex Rel. C.A. v. City of Blue Ash

Citations

  • 798 F.3d 338
  • 2015 FED App. 0191P
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 14293
  • 2015 WL 4774591

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a plaintiff alleging intentional discrimination under the ADA must “present evidence that animus against the protected group was a significant factor in” the discriminatory conduct
  • explaining that a plaintiff must show that “animus against the protected group was a significant factor” behind the defendant’s decision
  • allowing a miniature therapy horse to reside in disabled girl’s backyard wouldn’t necessarily fundamentally alter the nature of single-family neighborhoods
  • denying defendant summary judgment because reasonable jury could find that plaintiff’s requested accommodation was necessary
  • denying defendant summary judgment because reasonable jury could find that plaintiff’s requested accommodation was necessary
  • “Questioning the necessity and reasonability of a requested disability accommodation does not, by itself, create the inference of intentional discrimination.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole, Moore, Clay

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.