Anderson Development Co. v. Tobias

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “to establish a claim for abuse of process, a claimant must demonstrate ... an act in the use of the process not proper in the regular prosecution of the proceedings”
• holding that “to establish a claim for abuse of process, a claimant must demonstrate . . . an act in the use of the process not proper in the regular prosecution of the proceedings”
• suggesting that it may be proper to remand to state court even when the plaintiff might be required to amend its complaint in state court
• noting that Noerr-Pennington applies to state antitrust and tort claims
• “[O]nly one alternative, either improper purpose or improper means, need be established; a plaintiff need not prove both.”
• “A claim for intentional interference with economic relations protects both existing contractual relationships and prospective relationships of economic advantage not yet reduced to a formal contract.” (internal quotation marks, citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).