Anderson Contracting, Inc. Vs. Dsm Copolymers, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• dismissing Eighth Amendment action against doctor where allegations failed to make clear exactly what he was alleged to have done or what he knew about inmate’s condition
• dismissing complaint against defendant who was “barely mentioned in the complaint” and instead, was “merely lump[ed]. . . in with fifteen other medical professionals under the generic label ‘defendants’ or ‘Corizon healthcare providers’”
• collective and generalized allegations fail to state a plausible Eighth Amendment claim for lack of proper medical care
• A plaintiff must “do more than show that [his] rights were violated or that defendants, as a collective and undifferentiated whole, were responsible for those violations.”
• A plaintiff must “do more than show that [his] rights were violated or that defendants, as a collective and undifferentiated whole, were responsible for those violations.”
• A plaintiff must “do more than show that [his] rights were violated or that defendants, as a collective and undifferentiated whole, were responsible for those violations.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).