Andersen v. Lindenbaum

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• typographical error in letter constitutes reasonable explanation for incorrect date later attested to in deposition
• “To avoid summary judgment, the evidence presented in opposition to such a motion must . . . be sufficient to demonstrate that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the non-moving party.”
• “At the summary judgment stage, the trial judge’s function is not to weigh the evidence and decide what occurred,” nor should it “determine which evidence is the more credible.”
• “To avoid summary judgment, the evidence presented in opposition to such a motion must therefore be sufficient to demonstrate that a reasonable jury could return a verdict for the non-moving party.”
• “[I]f the evidence presented in opposition to summary judgment is so 23 incredible that it could not be accepted as true by a reasonable jury, it cannot serve to create a ‘genuine’ issue, or dispute, of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).