Andersen v. Advertising

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that § 4.59 requires that the listed range of motion testing be conducted to the extent practicable in all cases involving joint disabilities
• holding that additional requirements must be met prior to finding that a VA examination is adequate
• holding that 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 is ambiguous because its language is susceptible to more than one meaning
• holding that the final sentence of 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 (2015) requires that VA examinations include joint testing for pain on both active and passive motion, in weight-bearing and nonweight-bearing and, if possible, with range of motion measurements of the opposite undamaged joint
• examining the placement of 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 within the regulatory scheme to determine its meaning
• examining the placement of 38 C.F.R. § 4.59 within the regulatory scheme to determine its meaning

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).