Anden v. Litinsky

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a corporate officer could be held liable under FDUTPA where he directly negotiated with plaintiff and effectuated the corporation’s FDUTPA violations
• noting it is unnecessary to pierce the corporate veil because the individual defendant was a direct participant in the dealings

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).