Ancor Holdings, LLC v. Peterson, Goldman & Villani, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• \[W]e may not vacate an award even if it is based upon a mistake in law or fact.\
• “[W]e may not vacate an award even if it is based upon a mistake in law or fact.”
• “Although Ancor’s first argument is couched in terms of whether the arbitrator exceeded her powers, Ancor’s argument is actually a complaint that the arbitrator committed an error of law.”
• “Although Ancor’s first argument is couched in terms of whether the arbitrator exceeded her powers, Ancor’s argument is actually a complaint that the arbitrator committed an error of law.”
• an award draws its essence from the contract when it is rationally inferable from the contract, that is when it is derived from the wording or the purpose of the contract
• under restricted judicial review, we cannot vacate an award based upon the ground that the arbitrator misread the contract or made a mistake in law or fact when issuing the award

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).