Anchrum v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that litigants may not use post-argument letters “as a means to advance new arguments couched as supplemental authorities”
• explaining that litigants may not use Rule 28(j) letters “as a means to advance new arguments couched as supplemental authorities”
• explaining that first-degree murder under § 1111 requires “premeditation,” while second-degree murder requires simply “malice aforethought” (internal quotation marks omitted)
• finding malice when Defendant \drew his firearm and pursued the fleeing\ victim
• \We do not countenance a litigant's use of Rule 28(j) as a means to advance new arguments couched as supplemental authorities.\
• “We do not countenance a litigant’s use of Rule 28(j) as a means to advance new arguments couched as supplemental authorities.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).