Anchorage Chrysler Center, Inc. v. DaimlerChrysler Motors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that nominal damages are appropriate where a plaintiff shows \actual loss or injury\ but fails to prove \the extent and amount of damages\
• identifying fifth element of intentional misrepresentation as \loss\ caused by the tortious conduct
• awarding appellants nominal damages after they alleged they were fraudulently induced to change their logos, and thus incurred damages in the cost of changing logos, but failed to prove an exact monetary loss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).