Ancelet v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• granting summary judgment and stating that the “fact, without more,” that “the place of performance [of plaintiff’s work] was provided by” the railroad “does not determine the issue of plaintiff’s status”
• applying Lindsey while drawing upon the Fifth Circuit’s borrowed employee caselaw

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).