Anaya-Ortiz v. Holder

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that this court has no jurisdiction to reweigh the BIA’s determination that a felony DUI causing injury conviction under California law constitutes a particularly serious crime
• holding that we “review for abuse of discretion the BIA’s conclusion that an offense constitutes a particularly serious crime”
• concluding that the BIA engaged in the 3 19-72258 appropriate particularly serious crime analysis
• concluding that the agency engaged in the appropriate particularly serious crime analysis
• noting that this Court has no jurisdiction to make the determination, only to determine whether the BIA applied the correct legal standard
• explaining that the four so-called “Frentescu factors” constitute, with certain regulatory modifications, “the applicable legal standard for determining whether a particularly serious crime has been committed”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).