Anastasia S. Christopher, Cross-Appellant v. Stouder Memorial Hospital, Cross-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the plaintiff had no need to prove pretext where she presented, and the factfinder believed, that her supervisors informed her and told others that their actions were taken in response to her protected activity
• nurse who was formally employed by doctor was employee of hospital under Title VII because hospital could bar her from working on the premises
• “The fact that [§ 2000e-5] purports to provide remedies for a class broader than direct employees is a strong indication that the proscriptions contemplated by [§ 2000e- 3] reach beyond the immediate employment relationship.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).