Anastacia S. Lacombe and Max P. Lacombe v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company, etc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the trial of the issue of fact regarding plaintiff's right to enforce the note via ownership thereof rendered any error in the denial of summary judgment moot.”
• borrower’s denial of Bank’s allegation that it had standing to foreclose made this element of the cause of action a material fact in dispute
• “We review the sufficiency of the evidence to prove standing to bring a foreclosure action de novo.” (citing Dixon v. Express Equity Lending Grp., LLLP, 125 So.3d 965 (Fla. 4th DCA 2013))
• “Absent evidence of the plaintiffs standing, the final judgment must be reversed.”
• “Absent evidence of the plaintiff’s standing, the final judgment must be reversed.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).