Anamax Mining Co. v. Arizona Department of Economic Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding the supreme court rule gov erned whether employee of corporation could represent corporation in proceeding, even when state statute allowed “[a]ny corporation [to.be] represented by an officer or an authorized representative”
• “[T]he credibility of witnesses is a matter peculiarly within the province of the trier of facts.”
• affirming administrative finding that layperson employee could not represent company

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).