Ana Maria Edelmann v. The Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the statute of limitations on the parent bank’s indebtedness begins to run from the date of demand”
• concluding that plaintiffs suit in 1985 to recover funds and interest from CDs issued in 1958 and mature in 1959 was timely because plaintiffs did not demand payment until 1985
• determining that New York law applied to the case
• \Demand occurs upon presentment and refusal to pay.\ (quoting Garcia v. Chase Manhattan Bank, N.A., 735 F.2d 645, 648 (2d Cir. 1984))
• relying on Restatement principles in determining federal choice of law
• applying federal common law choice-of-law rules in non-diversity case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).