· 6/13/2011
A.N.A ex rel. S.F.A. v. Breckinridge County Board of Education
Citations
- 833 F. Supp. 2d 673
- 2011 WL 2437809
- 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63068
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “Absent persuasive evidence to the contrary, the Court can conclude only 3 that [Defendants] are capable of working to support their basic necessities.”
- “[T]hese arguments are forfeited because they were raised for the first time in a reply brief.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: III
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.