Skip to main content
· 6/13/2011

A.N.A ex rel. S.F.A. v. Breckinridge County Board of Education

Citations

  • 833 F. Supp. 2d 673
  • 2011 WL 2437809
  • 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 63068

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Absent persuasive evidence to the contrary, the Court can conclude only 3 that [Defendants] are capable of working to support their basic necessities.”
  • “[T]hese arguments are forfeited because they were raised for the first time in a reply brief.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: III

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.