Skip to main content
· 6/27/2013

Amy Roth v. Cha Hollywood Medical Center

Citations

  • 720 F.3d 1121
  • 20 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1536
  • 2013 WL 3214941
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 13224

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing a concern that a 11 defendant might “seek removal only when it becomes strategically advantageous for it to do so”
  • observing § 1446(c) requires that “a notice of removal must be filed, in any 20 event, within one year of the commencement of the action”
  • observing § 1446(c) requires that “a notice of removal must be filed, in any 20 event, within one year of the commencement of the action”
  • observing § 1446(c) requires that “a notice of removal must be filed, in any 20 event, within one year of the commencement of the action”
  • observing § 1446(c) requires that “a notice of removal must be filed, in any 20 event, within one year of the commencement of the action”
  • “[A] defendant does not have a duty of inquiry if the initial pleading or 21 other document is ‘indeterminate’ with respect to removability.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Trott, Lucero, Fletcher

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.