Amy Gorman v. Verizon Wireless Texas, L.L.C., et a

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that ten months was too long to establish the temporal proximity necessary to make the third prong of plaintiff's prima facie case
• explaining that under the federal rules, a plaintiff may plead inconsistent theories in the alternative
• holding the substantive law governing Title VII and Texas state law retaliation claims is identical
• stating that a plaintiff must take certain administrative steps before pursuing judicial remedies
• finding a lack of causation where ten months separated the protected activity and the adverse employment action
• applying Texas law and holding that substantive law governing Title VII and related claims and the TCHRA are identical

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).