Amvest Funding Co. v. Rex Group, Inc. (In Re Rex Group, Inc.)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that horses were not inventory held for sale but rather equipment based in part on a security agreement’s terms
• lessee’s promises to pay maintenance, insurance, taxes and all other expenses related to ownership indicia of secured loan rather than lease
• “[i]t has been held that statements in a security agreement are not conclusive evidence of the owner’s intended use of collateral”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).