Amsinck v. Columbia Pictures Industries, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendant’s display of copyrighted mobile in its entirety in defendant’s film for periods of a few seconds and over a total of ninety-six seconds — at some points in close-ups — did not preclude a finding of fair use
• \defendants might still be entitled to a fair use defense\
• noting possible increase in demand after reproduction

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).