Amro v. Bellamy

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a party’s prearbitration conduct cannot be considered when deciding whether to impose Rule 91(b) sanctions
• holding a party's prearbitration conduct cannot be considered when deciding whether to impose Rule 91(b) sanctions
• holding a party's prearbitration conduct cannot be considered when deciding whether to impose Rule 91(b) sanctions
• trial court abused its discretion in debarring defendant from rejecting arbitration award as a “ ‘sanction[ ] for failure to comply with discovery’ ” where he participated in good faith at the arbitration hearing (emphasis in original)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).