Skip to main content
· 8/27/1996

Ampex Corp. v. Mitsubishi Electric Corp.

Citations

  • 937 F. Supp. 352
  • 40 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1533
  • 36 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 707
  • 1996 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13349
  • 1996 WL 520538

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “It is not correct, therefore, to say that a party cannot elect the option to produce documents under Rule 33(d) and at the same time withhold documents as privileged. It would be more accurate to say that a party cannot elect the option under Rule 33(d

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McKelvie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.