Amp Products Corp. v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the federal tax scheme is inapplicable in Pennsylvania because, “[a]s a sovereign, the Commonwealth can impose its own scheme of taxation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Conner, C. v. Holtzinger Conner, K.
  Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2019-08-20· cited 38×
• Kalodner v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-08-27· cited 10×
• Ignatz v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2004-05-12· cited 3×
• J. & K. Pearlstein v. Com. of PA
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 2021-12-02
• Pearlstein, J. & K., Aplts. v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2024-09-26

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• HK Porter Company Appeal
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1966-05-24· cited 16×
• Doyle Equipment Co. v. Commonwealth
  Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-06-09· cited 12×

Other cases named Amp Products Corp. v. Commonwealth

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

• AMP Products Corp. v. Commonwealth
  Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-06-11· cited 2×