Amoss v. University of Washington

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• limiting its review to the board of regents and the president, because they were vested with final authority in tenure decisions
• affirming conclusion that memoranda analyzing legal implications of tenure decision, prepared and conveyed in confidence by counsel to university president and board of regents, were privileged; noting that the professor had access to all the facts in the memoranda
• if disputed, materials sought should be submitted to the court for an in camera inspection
• assistant attorney general represented dean in appeal of tenure decision to university president while another assistant attorney general advised president and board
• assistant attorney general represented dean in appeal of tenure decision to university president while another assistant attorney general advised president and board

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).