Amoco Production Co. v. Smith

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• restitution allowed when company It is undisputed that appellees held money. But the issue is paid royalty interests to wrong person
• “A cause of action for money had and received belongs conceptually to the doctrine of unjust enrichment.”
• restitution allowed when company paid royalty interests to wrong person
• unjust enrichment, implied and constructive contracts and trusts
• dealing with a claim for money had and received
• dealing with a claim for money had and received

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).