Amoco Production Co. v. Jicarilla Apache Tribe

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that filing of a false disciplinary charge in retaliation 17 for a grievance filed by an inmate is actionable under section 1983
• concluding that evidence of fraudulent intent was sufficient in part because of the defendant's \supervisory responsibilities\
• holding that filing of a false disciplinary charge in retaliation 18 for a grievance filed by an inmate is actionable under section 1983
• concluding that the McDaniel approach ‘would in effect grant a defendant transactional immunity once it is shown that government attorneys or investigators involved in the prosecution were exposed to the immunized testimony’
• concluding that the McDaniel approach 'would in effect grant a defendant transactional immunity once it is shown that government attorneys or investigators involved in the prosecution were exposed to the immunized testimony'
• concluding that the McDaniel approach “would in effect grant a defendant transactional immunity once it is shown that government attorneys or investigators involved in the prosecution were exposed to the immunized testimony”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).