· 12/14/2000
Amoco Oil Company v. United States
Citations
- 234 F.3d 1374
- 22 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1865
- 86 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7250
- 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 31845
- 2000 WL 1844699
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that parties must raise all issues they wish to challenge in the opening brief
- criticizing counsel’s “fail[ure] to cite, much less distinguish, clearly governing case law” as potential violation of Rule 3.3
- “On a motion to dismiss for failure state a claim, any factual allegations in the com- plaint are assumed to be true and all inferences are drawn in favor of the plaintiff.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Mayer, Newman, Lourie
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.