Skip to main content
· 12/14/2000

Amoco Oil Company v. United States

Citations

  • 234 F.3d 1374
  • 22 I.T.R.D. (BNA) 1865
  • 86 A.F.T.R.2d (RIA) 7250
  • 2000 U.S. App. LEXIS 31845
  • 2000 WL 1844699

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that parties must raise all issues they wish to challenge in the opening brief
  • criticizing counsel’s “fail[ure] to cite, much less distinguish, clearly governing case law” as potential violation of Rule 3.3
  • “On a motion to dismiss for failure state a claim, any factual allegations in the com- plaint are assumed to be true and all inferences are drawn in favor of the plaintiff.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Mayer, Newman, Lourie

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.