Amoco Oil Co. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[G]ranting vacatur to a party who both causes mootness and pursues dismissal based on mootness serves only the interests of that party.”
• evaluating movant’s actions to determine whether it was entitled to “equitable remedy” of vacatur under Rule 60(b)
• “[G]ranting vacatur to a party who both causes mootness and pursues dismissal based on mootness serves only the interests of that party.”
• declining to find exceptional circumstances based on a speculative threat of future harm
• “granting vacatur to a party who both causes mootness and pursues dismissal based on mootness serves only the interests of that party” and “amounts to a de facto reversal of an abandoned claim”
• “We have ... recognized that granting vacatur to a party who both causes mootness and pursues dismissal based on mootness serves only the interests of that party.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).