Skip to main content
· 2/12/1965

Ammesmaki v. Interlake Steamship Co.

Citations

  • 342 F.2d 627
  • 1965 A.M.C. 1528

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no specific intent to exclude helium will be inferred where lessors neither knew of presence nor appreciated value of helium gas
  • no specific intent to exclude helium will be inferred where lessors neither knew of presence nor appreciated value of helium gas
  • no specific intent to exclude helium will be inferred where lessors neither knew,of presence nor appreciated value of helium gas
  • no specific intent to exclude helium will be inferred where lessors neither knew of presence nor appreciated value of helium gas

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schnackenberg, Swygert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.