· 2/12/1965
Ammesmaki v. Interlake Steamship Co.
Citations
- 342 F.2d 627
- 1965 A.M.C. 1528
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no specific intent to exclude helium will be inferred where lessors neither knew of presence nor appreciated value of helium gas
- no specific intent to exclude helium will be inferred where lessors neither knew of presence nor appreciated value of helium gas
- no specific intent to exclude helium will be inferred where lessors neither knew,of presence nor appreciated value of helium gas
- no specific intent to exclude helium will be inferred where lessors neither knew of presence nor appreciated value of helium gas
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Schnackenberg, Swygert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.