Ammerman v. Raymond Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the other defendant “did not object to [plaintiff’s] choice of forum and did not file a motion to transfer”
• observing that, where a locality has an interest in deciding a controversy, “[i]t thus follows that jurors residing in [that locality] have an interest in hearing and resolving such a claim”
• observing that, where Cook County has an interest in deciding a controversy, “[i]t thus follows that jurors residing in Cook County have an interest in hearing and resolving such a claim”
• “forum non conveniens claims are adjudicated on a case-by-case basis with the results heavily dependent upon the facts of each case”
• “the location of documentary evidence has become less significant because today’s technology allows documents to be copied and transported easily and inexpensively”
• “the location of documentary evidence has become less significant because today’s technology allows documents to be copied and transported easily and inexpensively”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).