Skip to main content
· 6/9/1933

Amity Holding Corp. v. Eden

Citations

  • 238 A.D. 628
  • 265 N.Y.S. 23
  • 1933 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9577

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • invalidating soda portion size rule in part because it \evidenced a policy choice\
  • soda portion size ban had so many exceptions, and was so indirectly connected to health consequences of soda consumption, as to not objectively advance the public health goals articulated in the enabling sections of the City Charter

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Carswell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.