Amiss v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding use of illegally seized evidence at probation revocation hearing is no less an invasion of an individual’s constitutional rights than use of such evidence at trial
• finding use of illegally seized evidence at probation revocation hearing is no less an invasion of an individual's constitutional rights than use of such evidence at trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).