Amiri v. Stoladi Property Group

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a security guard was not an employee of a property manager with \no authority to direct or control\ him
• explaining that the “90-day period is tolled between the time a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis are received by the Court and the time the Court rules on the application”
• explaining that tolling continues until “the time the Court rules on the application”
• explaining that tolling continues until “the time the Court rules on -the application”
• explaining that the \90-day period is tolled between the time a complaint and an application to proceed in forma pauperis are received by the Court and the time the Court rules on the application\
• explaining that \[t]he Clerk of the Court will not accept a complaint for filing that is not accompanied by a filing fee until the Court has granted a petition for leave to proceed in forma pauperis\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).